<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://www.fsc-watch.org/">
  <title>FSC-Watch</title>
  <link>http://www.fsc-watch.org/</link>
  <description></description>
  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
    <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/11/09/FSC_vs_PEFC__Holy_cows_vs_the_Emperor_s_new_clothes#c735" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/11/09/FSC_vs_PEFC__Holy_cows_vs_the_Emperor_s_new_clothes#c734" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/11/09/FSC_vs_PEFC__Holy_cows_vs_the_Emperor_s_new_clothes#c733" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2008/07/05/FSC_undermines_paper#c732" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2007/05/30/_Non_existent__indigenous_people_challenge_WWF_s_certified__model__forest_project__Komi__Russia#c731" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2007/05/30/_Non_existent__indigenous_people_challenge_WWF_s_certified__model__forest_project__Komi__Russia#c730" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/11/09/FSC_vs_PEFC__Holy_cows_vs_the_Emperor_s_new_clothes#c729" />
<rdf:li resource="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2010/07/11/_Swedish_Society_for#c728" />
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>
</channel>

  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/11/09/FSC_vs_PEFC__Holy_cows_vs_the_Emperor_s_new_clothes#c735">
    <title>Comment by Alexander  Yakovlev on 'FSC vs PEFC: Holy cows vs the Emperor's new clothes'</title>
    <link>http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/11/09/FSC_vs_PEFC__Holy_cows_vs_the_Emperor_s_new_clothes#c735</link>
    <dc:date>2010-08-29T20:00:49+02:00</dc:date>
    <description><![CDATA[Do not foget, forest operation is only some part FSC standard. In order to fulfil the standard it is neccessary having forest management system (i.e. system of quality). Any body have it? Perhaps, but this information is secret. This is shows that FSC certifiction is fiction. What the fiction for? Certanely for money....     ]]></description>
  </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/11/09/FSC_vs_PEFC__Holy_cows_vs_the_Emperor_s_new_clothes#c734">
    <title>Comment by Chris Lang on 'FSC vs PEFC: Holy cows vs the Emperor's new clothes'</title>
    <link>http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/11/09/FSC_vs_PEFC__Holy_cows_vs_the_Emperor_s_new_clothes#c734</link>
    <dc:date>2010-08-23T05:06:33+02:00</dc:date>
    <description><![CDATA[@ImProCertifcation - Is it true that the better the forest certification audit is, the more improvement we are going to see in forest operations? If so, that suggests that there is a place for criticism of FSC (and, of course, PEFC and other certification schemes) in order to ensure that certified operations are actually meeting the standards. <br />
<br />
But when FSC certifies socially and environmentally damaging forestry operations, such as Veracel in Brazil (http://bit.ly/aEAfsQ) or monoculture plantations in Uruguay (http://bit.ly/cmz6TZ) it is actually undermining local struggles. ]]></description>
  </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/11/09/FSC_vs_PEFC__Holy_cows_vs_the_Emperor_s_new_clothes#c733">
    <title>Comment by ImProCertifcation on 'FSC vs PEFC: Holy cows vs the Emperor's new clothes'</title>
    <link>http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/11/09/FSC_vs_PEFC__Holy_cows_vs_the_Emperor_s_new_clothes#c733</link>
    <dc:date>2010-08-19T03:00:18+02:00</dc:date>
    <description><![CDATA[Chris, you are ignoring the fact that the forest audit does improve forest operations. It has changed the mindset of many poeple, and there are people in the industry who cannot see the advantages of running a timber business with green fingers, but for the most, we can. The more we involve stakeholders, the more we are prepared to listen, the better it becomes. But this is mostly as a result of forest certification audits - FACT]]></description>
  </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2008/07/05/FSC_undermines_paper#c732">
    <title>Comment by Subhan on 'FSC undermines paper recycling, contributes to global warming'</title>
    <link>http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2008/07/05/FSC_undermines_paper#c732</link>
    <dc:date>2010-08-11T09:43:22+02:00</dc:date>
    <description><![CDATA[can anybody advise FSC paper is recycle??]]></description>
  </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2007/05/30/_Non_existent__indigenous_people_challenge_WWF_s_certified__model__forest_project__Komi__Russia#c731">
    <title>Comment by gerriet harms on ''Non-existent' indigenous people challenge WWF's certified 'model' forest project, Komi, Russia'</title>
    <link>http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2007/05/30/_Non_existent__indigenous_people_challenge_WWF_s_certified__model__forest_project__Komi__Russia#c731</link>
    <dc:date>2010-08-09T12:16:39+02:00</dc:date>
    <description><![CDATA[typical WWF, is WWF indead a NGO and NPO??? i cannot believe.<br />
Mondi, one of the main criminal destroyer of Promary froest in hte world (main Funder of FSC) get now from WWF the gloriole of &quot;1. Place in Paper Company Environmental Index&quot; (see: http://www.druckspiegel.de/news/show/branchen-news/32149/WWF_kuert_Mondi_zur_Nummer_1)<br />
with which eyes WWF are looking in the world, - cannot be from ecological sight..... just unbelievable. No word! <br />
<br />
Maybe &quot;someone&quot; must attac WWF if they can have any longer the NPO Status?, maybe they must get the status of &quot;Worldwide Loobyist for destroyers of Forests&quot;???<br />
with this act, WWF lost the rest of reputation they have in my mind.<br />
gerriet<br />
]]></description>
  </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2007/05/30/_Non_existent__indigenous_people_challenge_WWF_s_certified__model__forest_project__Komi__Russia#c730">
    <title>Comment by Alexander on ''Non-existent' indigenous people challenge WWF's certified 'model' forest project, Komi, Russia'</title>
    <link>http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2007/05/30/_Non_existent__indigenous_people_challenge_WWF_s_certified__model__forest_project__Komi__Russia#c730</link>
    <dc:date>2010-08-06T20:52:47+02:00</dc:date>
    <description><![CDATA[According to Russian legislation, leshoz can not trasformed in anything. Leshozes and forest management of the State organizations can change only by Russian Government. WWF lies, in order to receive money from donors. <br />
<br />
Features of Russian Forestry: http://www.fsc-russia.com/eng/world-forests#features <br />
<br />
Alexander.]]></description>
  </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/11/09/FSC_vs_PEFC__Holy_cows_vs_the_Emperor_s_new_clothes#c729">
    <title>Comment by Chris Lang on 'FSC vs PEFC: Holy cows vs the Emperor's new clothes'</title>
    <link>http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2006/11/09/FSC_vs_PEFC__Holy_cows_vs_the_Emperor_s_new_clothes#c729</link>
    <dc:date>2010-08-03T02:09:42+02:00</dc:date>
    <description><![CDATA[@Steve - Thanks for this comment. I have a question for you: Does it bother you that AFS, as a member of PEFC, is part of the same certification scheme that certified Asia Pulp and Paper's operations in Sumatra? <br />
<br />
For further details, see Greenpeace's recent report &quot;How Sinar Mas is Pulping the Planet&quot;, available here: http://bit.ly/dtV6Kl.]]></description>
  </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2010/07/11/_Swedish_Society_for#c728">
    <title>Comment by anders cederberg on ' Swedish Society for Nature Conservation resigns from FSC Sweden'</title>
    <link>http://www.fsc-watch.org/archives/2010/07/11/_Swedish_Society_for#c728</link>
    <dc:date>2010-08-03T02:06:15+02:00</dc:date>
    <description><![CDATA[this is nothing short of a scandal. the disaster and havoc this creates in the name of profit yet again shows clearly how an economy devised by share-holders provincial interest not only is sectarian but a in its extension a real threat to our very basis for survival and prosperity. while they reap short-term financial gain the real problem surfaces when this type of unnatural, illegal and unthoroughly thought out plans finally cause severe reactions  to our environment. these people aren't even civilized. the whole situation smells in fact of corruption. the democratically chosen reps for the people must have their heads deeply lodged up their behinds. they certainly know nothing about nature, medicine and healing. where is the plan for a sustainable life-style that creates joy and hope? wallet-street has barked loudest yet again, and all for the benefit of the filthy few.]]></description>
  </item>
  </rdf:RDF>
